Comments on: Michael Vick?

By: Shaun Dolence

Shaun Dolence — Tue, 11 Aug 2009 15:35:12 +0000

Agreed, capt seahawk. If Michael Vick somehow ends up in Seattle, it won’t change my loyalty as a fan of the team.

However, I still believe this is a long-shot, at best. Even though I agree that Vick has paid his debt to society and deserves another chance in the NFL, I don’t think it will be in Seattle.

Tim Ruskell and company put an emphasis on character, and have turned away other talented players for more minor infractions. And I doubt Paul Allen would be okay with the media frenzy and protests that would surround the acquisition.

By: capt seahawk

capt seahawk — Tue, 11 Aug 2009 13:08:19 +0000

Vick would be a good back-up in Seattle. He’s paid his debt to society and earned the right to rebuild his life. Just think… what if he was BEHIND Hasselback and available as a direct snap runner, that could pass? Would sure change the way defenses had to prepare for us. Matt is no spring chicken and sticking our head in the sand will not change that. Anyone that doesn’t want to watch….there is a knob on the TV that can be used to turn it off, go play in the park. As for me, I have been a S’quawk fan since day 1, that ain’t gonna change.

By: Mace

Mace — Mon, 10 Aug 2009 21:59:32 +0000

Of excuse me not proof reading my work.. my bad

By: Mace

Mace — Mon, 10 Aug 2009 21:57:27 +0000

Mike vick would be a good fit eventhough I hate Seattle the only reason why the Falcons didn’t go back to NFC championship is because Arthur Blanks is to stupid to know what works for his team. The falcons began to have problems when they cut T.J. Duckett… If you got mike vick, T.J. Duckett, and a fast running back. There are few teams that can stop you ask St.Louis we they played them in the playoffs on the way to NFC Championship game. You’d get a more mature Vick and by mid season if you all are not were you want to be… Mike a win you the second have of the season… but I hate seattle, I’d never get a chance to see him play.. by the way who ever wrote this article can’t play football anyway he probably sat on the sidelines or never got picked as a kid to play football.

By: GoCougs!

GoCougs! — Mon, 27 Jul 2009 06:04:32 +0000

Vick should be suspended for another 6 games at least. Make him sit on the sideline in Detroit or Cleveland – somewhere not as enticing as Seattle. Then if he proves he can be a good teammate just waiting, then I think he would deserve a shot. But he should also have to do animal rights PSAs. No matter what he does, I don’t want him in Seattle though.

By: hawks4life

hawks4life — Fri, 29 May 2009 06:57:21 +0000

vick is a ten time better Q then seneca haha he is like short and not nearly has fast or strong has vick! wat do you think vick did in prison shit there with his tumb up is A** no he worked his ass off!

By: the matador

the matador — Sat, 04 Apr 2009 21:38:32 +0000

Michael Vick is a piece of sh**t that should spend the rest of his life digging ditches on the chain gang at an old run down Alabama state prison. If the NFL lets him put on another set of pads I will quit watching the game.

By: Shaun Dolence

Shaun Dolence — Tue, 17 Feb 2009 00:39:27 +0000

I completely agree, Ryan.

By: Ryan

Ryan — Mon, 16 Feb 2009 22:13:52 +0000

LMAO.

I’m really having a hard time seeing any of the Seahawks brass letting that deal happen. Seneca Wallace is a better option than Michael Vick.

Besides, who’s even said the NFL will let Vick suit up again…

By: The Dirty Bird

The Dirty Bird — Mon, 16 Feb 2009 00:43:23 +0000

I think Vick is a better possibility for Seattle than you think. I will agree that maybe not so much as a QB but with the sore lack of athleticism in the Seahawks offense I think that Vick could fit in as a slot receiver or punt/kickoff returner.

Time will tell but I have a feeling it could happen.