<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2010 NFL Mock Draft 1.1: Top 15</title>
	<atom:link href="http://12thmanrising.com/2010/02/23/2010-nfl-mock-draft-1-1-top-15/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://12thmanrising.com/2010/02/23/2010-nfl-mock-draft-1-1-top-15/</link>
	<description>A Seattle Seahawks Fan Site - News, Blogs, Opinion and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 19:12:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Maxmilian</title>
		<link>http://12thmanrising.com/2010/02/23/2010-nfl-mock-draft-1-1-top-15/comment-page-1/#comment-1123</link>
		<dc:creator>Maxmilian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 12:38:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://12thmanrising.com/?p=1447#comment-1123</guid>
		<description>C&#039;mon no Sam Bradford in the first 15 picks? You&#039;ve gotta be crazy. First of all, I would contend that IF he were available at #14 the Seahawks would definitely take him, the guy could be the best QB in the draft. Frankly there&#039;s no way he makes it that far. You forget that due to rookie contract structuring all of these guys will be making big time cash. Money plays a big role in this, it&#039;s hard to justif paying someone a boatloads of cash unless they play a position that demands it - which is basically quarterback. For a team with a top 10 pick, drafting a QB makes sense because you&#039;re more comfortable paying the guy big time than you are throwing that kind of cash at a defensive end or wide reciever. Besides! You don&#039;t think Denver would love to upgrade on Kyle Orton at #10? Until you put Bradford in the top 15 this mock carries no weight my friend - and I say that as an avid reader and fan. Go hawks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>C&#8217;mon no Sam Bradford in the first 15 picks? You&#8217;ve gotta be crazy. First of all, I would contend that IF he were available at #14 the Seahawks would definitely take him, the guy could be the best QB in the draft. Frankly there&#8217;s no way he makes it that far. You forget that due to rookie contract structuring all of these guys will be making big time cash. Money plays a big role in this, it&#8217;s hard to justif paying someone a boatloads of cash unless they play a position that demands it &#8211; which is basically quarterback. For a team with a top 10 pick, drafting a QB makes sense because you&#8217;re more comfortable paying the guy big time than you are throwing that kind of cash at a defensive end or wide reciever. Besides! You don&#8217;t think Denver would love to upgrade on Kyle Orton at #10? Until you put Bradford in the top 15 this mock carries no weight my friend &#8211; and I say that as an avid reader and fan. Go hawks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

