Seattle Seahawks Face A Tough Decision At Defensive End

Jan 6, 2013; Landover, MD, USA; Seattle Seahawks defensive end Chris Clemons (91) lies on the ground after being injured against the Washington Redskins in the fourth quarter in the NFC Wild Card playoff game at FedEx Field. The Seahawks won 24-14. Mandatory Credit: Geoff Burke-USA TODAY Sports

Yesterday, I made the mistake of looking at the contract for Chris Clemons. If I could go back, I’d force my self not to look. Seriously, I wish I hadn’t.

It’s not huge, especially for a player with his production. In fact you could argue that he’s underpaid if you compare his contract so some of his peers.

So why, you might ask, do I wish I hadn’t looked? Because there’s a problem.

Clemons will count $8.16 million against the cap in 2013, and will almost certainly miss at least the first 10 games of the year. That is, unfortunately, not smart way to use your salary cap space. Especially if his injury pushes the Seahawks to sign another DE (John Abraham perhaps) to a fairly large contract to try and offset his absence.

Look, I am not, in any way, advocating that the Seahawks release Clemons. I advocated for the Seahawks to get him his new deal when it was time. And would love to see him retire as a Seahawk. I believe that John Schneider and Pete Carroll agree, and want to keep him on the roster.

I also know that they might not have a choice. The Seahawks are gearing up for a run at a Super Bowl. They need to fix the pass rush, and it might not be able to be done on the cheap. It’s quite possible that the Seahawks will get to a point where they need that cap space to sign another player, and can’t find it in any other way.

This is one of those unfortunate aspects of a salary cap league. Resources are limited. Tying up a bunch of those resources in a player who you know wont be playing just isn’t using your resources wisely.

It would be an easier choice If Clemons was locked up long-term, but he’s not. He only has 2 years remaining, and one of those being the this next year when he’s unlikely to play much. So keeping him with his current contract would be  handcuffing them this year just to get one more year of his services.

Basically what I’m saying is don’t be surprised if something changes. Releasing Clemons would be the most extreme of all the options, and likely would be a “last resort” measure.

More likely is that the Seahawks will rework his contract. Adding a year would make sense as long as it allowed the team to drastically reduce his cap number in 2013. The could even simply ask him to take a pay cut for this season since he wont be playing much, but they’d also have to be willing to deal with the situation if he says “no” to that request.

Ultimately, I don’t have the answer. I want Clemons to remain with the team, but I understand that using 6.5% of your total cap space on the player you know ahead of time wont be playing also doesn’t make much sense.

Clearly, the Seahawks have a tough decision to make here. I’m just glad I’m not the one who has to make it.

Topics: Chris Clemons, Seattle Seahawks

Want more from 12th Man Rising?  
Subscribe to FanSided Daily for your morning fix. Enter your email and stay in the know.
  • kikiri

    if suggs was only out for 8 games then clem will. be out for a max of 6 or 7 probably less around 2-3 gotta remember it has been 2 months now clem still has 6 months he might not be a 100% but I wont be surprised to see him ready to go even in week one

    • 12thMan_Rising

      for the type of surgery he had, recovery is typically 12 months. NFL players with all of the rehab specialists helping them can usually do it in 10. Clemons is almost certainly going to start the year on the PUP list, which means he’ll be out until week 8, and that is when he can start practicing. 2-3 weeks more before he’s ready to play.

  • http://twitter.com/DaynaOG DaynaO

    The thought of losing Clem makes me ill.

    • 12thMan_Rising

      you and me both.

  • Marc Edge

    could they release him if he is injured? perhaps they would have to negotiate an injury settlement. would the settlement amount count against the salary cap? is there a capologist in the house?

    • 12thMan_Rising

      They can release him as long as it’s determined that his injury isn’t career threatening. If it is, then they’d have to pay his 2013 salary, but it would not count against the cap in this case.

  • http://Allcougdup.com/ All Coug’d Up

    There’s no “injury settlement” that I know of. Also, they’re not letting him back with what he does until he’s 100% so he’ll likely miss the minimum of 8-10 games for sure. Reworking his contract is the smartest thing to do imo. But he’s not going anywhere either. PC and JS will draft it up so they can keep him, because Clem’s value to them is in the playoffs anyway, and think about a rested Clemons just hitting his stride at playoff time next year with basically 3 starters in himself Bryant and drafted guy, along with Irvin for pass rush?!?!

    HOWEVER, if Clem says “no” to a rework… it becomes a different story.

    • 12thMan_Rising

      I think you’re right. Reworking the deal is the best option, as as long as they add a year and maybe guarantee part of his 2013 salary I don’t think he’ll say no. Only way that happens is if they just ask him to simply take a pay cut with no concessions on their end.

  • Paddy

    Cut him. It’s time to go young. Draft a DE in the 2nd and pickup a veteran to play for a year or two who doesn’t have a big history of injuries. They can’t afford to be spending crazy money after the Harvin deal. Besides, Pete and Scneider have shown how good they are at drafting defensive players anyway.

TEAMFeed More Seahawks news from the Fansided Network

Comments 6

NFL Analyst Adam Schein Blasts Seahawks’ Repeat Chances

Comments 3

Report: Seahawks got one prime-time home game due to ‘recent blowouts’

Comments 0

Seahawks senior personnel executive Scot McCloughan resigns unexpectedly

Hot on the Web From seahawks.com