<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>12th Man Rising &#187; trade</title>
	<atom:link href="http://12thmanrising.com/tag/trade/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://12thmanrising.com</link>
	<description>A Seattle Seahawks Fan Site - News, Blogs, Opinion and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 15:40:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>NFL Draft Pick Value Chart</title>
		<link>http://12thmanrising.com/2011/12/31/nfl-draft-pick-value-chart/</link>
		<comments>http://12thmanrising.com/2011/12/31/nfl-draft-pick-value-chart/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2011 20:17:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Keith Myers</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NFL Draft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Draft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Value Chart]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://12thmanrising.com/?p=7126</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was working on a few draft day trade scenarios this morning, and needed a copy of draft pick value chart. I decided to post it on here in case anyone else wanted it. The way this works is that for any trade of draft picks, the picks given up by both teams should be [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was working on a few draft day trade scenarios this morning, and needed a copy of draft pick value chart. I decided to post it on here in case anyone else wanted it. The way this works is that for any trade of draft picks, the picks given up by both teams should be close to the same.</p>
<p>For example, If the Seahawks end up with pick #15, worth 1050 points, and they want to trade up to pick #5, worth 1700 points. That means they must also give up roughly another 450 points to make that trade happen. Their 2nd round pick is worth 430. Close enough as long as there isn&#8217;t another team trying to get up into that spot. If there is another potential buyer, the Seahawks would be expected to overpay a bit, and throw in an additional pick.</p>
<p>It should also be noted that picks in other drafts, are usually discounted by approximately 1 round for each year. So a 2013 1st round pick is worth roughly what a 2012 2rd pick is worth. A 2014 1st rounder is worth roughly a 3rd rounder in 2012, if that makes sense. So trading away distant picks gives progressively less value.</p>
<table width="66%" border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td colspan="2">
<p align="center">Round 1</p>
</td>
<td colspan="2">
<p align="center">Round 2</p>
</td>
<td colspan="2">
<p align="center">Round 3</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p align="center">1</p>
</td>
<td>
<p align="center">3,000</p>
</td>
<td>
<p align="center">33</p>
</td>
<td>
<p align="center">580</p>
</td>
<td>
<p align="center">65</p>
</td>
<td>
<p align="center">265</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p align="center">2</p>
</td>
<td>
<p align="center">2,600</p>
</td>
<td>
<p align="center">34</p>
</td>
<td>
<p align="center">560</p>
</td>
<td>
<p align="center">66</p>
</td>
<td>
<p align="center">260</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p align="center">3</p>
</td>
<td>
<p align="center">2,200</p>
</td>
<td>
<p align="center">35</p>
</td>
<td>
<p align="center">550</p>
</td>
<td>
<p align="center">67</p>
</td>
<td>
<p align="center">255</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p align="center">4</p>
</td>
<td>
<p align="center">1,800</p>
</td>
<td>
<p align="center">36</p>
</td>
<td>
<p align="center">540</p>
</td>
<td>
<p align="center">68</p>
</td>
<td>
<p align="center">250</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p align="center">5</p>
</td>
<td>
<p align="center">1,700</p>
</td>
<td>
<p align="center">37</p>
</td>
<td>
<p align="center">530</p>
</td>
<td>
<p align="center">69</p>
</td>
<td>
<p align="center">245 <a href="http://12thmanrising.com/2011/12/31/nfl-draft-pick-value-chart/#more-7126" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://12thmanrising.com/2011/12/31/nfl-draft-pick-value-chart/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>To Suck Or Not To Suck</title>
		<link>http://12thmanrising.com/2011/11/22/to-suck-or-not-to-suck/</link>
		<comments>http://12thmanrising.com/2011/11/22/to-suck-or-not-to-suck/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 05:43:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>12tharmy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Seahawks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Draft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://12thmanrising.com/?p=6880</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To suck or not to suck: The facts: One of the big debates within the 12th man is whether or not the Hawks should tank games to obtain a higher draft choice, or if they should trade the house to move up in the draft should they win too many games. You can logically argue [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To suck or not to suck: The facts:</p>
<p>One of the big debates within the 12th man is whether or not the Hawks should tank games to obtain a higher draft choice, or if they should trade the house to move up in the draft should they win too many games. You can logically argue both sides of each argument, but we all know the average 12th man is too stubborn to budge their opinion on such a pivotal topic. My general attitude is that winning begets more winning, but that’s just me.</p>
<p>Lets take a look at some of the first round draft choice trades from the last three years and see how they helped their teams in the short term, because we all want this team to be good as soon as possible, right? Ok. I’m not going to go into what each trade was traded for and so on, just who was selected in that spot.</p>
<p><strong>2009 #5: Cleveland &gt;New York Jets.</strong> Cleveland traded its first-round selection (5th overall, used to select Mark Sanchez) to the Jets for the Jets&#8217; first- and second-round selections (17th overall, traded to Tampa Bay, who selected Josh Freeman; and 52nd overall, used to select David Veikune), Kenyon Coleman, Brett Ratliff, and Abram Elam.<br />
So which end of this trade would you rather the hawks are on? Would you rather have Mark Sanchez, or Josh Freeman, David Veikune, Kenyon Coleman, Brett Ratliff, and Abram Elam? In my opinion Josh Freeman is every bit as good as Mark Sanchez, costs less, and the Browns got 3 guys to provide depth. (After all we should know that other teams’ unwanted players can do with the right coaching.)</p>
<p><strong>2010 #11</strong>:<strong> Chicago&gt;Denver</strong>.  <a href="http://12thmanrising.com/2011/11/22/to-suck-or-not-to-suck/#more-6880" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://12thmanrising.com/2011/11/22/to-suck-or-not-to-suck/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Deion Branch Deal is Great for Seattle</title>
		<link>http://12thmanrising.com/2010/10/12/deion-branch-deal-is-great-for-seattle/</link>
		<comments>http://12thmanrising.com/2010/10/12/deion-branch-deal-is-great-for-seattle/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2010 18:23:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Seahawks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deion Branch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deon Butler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Golden Tate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Schneider]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marshawn Lynch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota Vikings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New England Patriots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFL Draft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Randy Moss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seattle Seahawks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[T.J. Houshmandzadeh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wide receiver]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://12thmanrising.com/?p=3943</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday, the Seattle Seahawks traded wide receiver Deion Branch to the New England Patriots for a fourth-round pick. Not a conditional late-round pick or garbage compensation, but a fourth-round pick. What a coup for General Manager John Schneider and Seattle&#8217;s front office. When the Deion Branch-to-New England rumors first started, it was assumed Seattle would [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday, the Seattle Seahawks traded wide receiver Deion Branch to the New England Patriots for a fourth-round pick. Not a conditional late-round pick or garbage compensation, but a fourth-round pick.</p>
<p>What a coup for General Manager John Schneider and Seattle&#8217;s front office.</p>
<p>When the Deion Branch-to-New England rumors first started, it was assumed Seattle would receive no more than a late-round pick in any trade. Considering Randy Moss was just acquired by the Minnesota Vikings for a third-round pick, anything more than a sixth- or seventh-round pick would be ludicrous; Moss dwarves Branch in career accomplishments, late-career potential, physical size, overall skills.</p>
<p>Seattle&#8217;s incentive to trade Branch was to get the younger receivers more opportunity to play. Branch hasn&#8217;t been dominating or overly effective, so his exit only means players like Deon Butler and Golden Tate will receive additional opportunities on the field.</p>
<p>Like Houshmandzadeh&#8217;s departure, this deal is like addition by subtraction for the Seahawks.</p>
<p> <a href="http://12thmanrising.com/2010/10/12/deion-branch-deal-is-great-for-seattle/#more-3943" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://12thmanrising.com/2010/10/12/deion-branch-deal-is-great-for-seattle/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bye bye Branch.  Hello 4th Round.</title>
		<link>http://12thmanrising.com/2010/10/11/bye-bye-branch-hello-4th-round/</link>
		<comments>http://12thmanrising.com/2010/10/11/bye-bye-branch-hello-4th-round/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2010 02:31:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Popular]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seahawks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deion Branch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New England]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFL Draft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patriots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seattle Seahawks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://12thmanrising.com/2010/10/11/bye-bye-branch-hello-4th-round/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ESPN.com reports that Deion Branch has been traded back to the Patriots for a 4th round pick. I cannot believe New England gave up such a high pick for him. Branch is in the twilight of his career and proven to be injury prone. On the other hand, there was not a nicer guy in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ESPN.com reports that Deion Branch has been traded back to the Patriots for a 4th round pick.</p>
<p>I cannot believe New England gave up such a high pick for him.  Branch is in the twilight of his career and proven to be injury prone. On the other hand, there was not a nicer guy in the locker room.  His radio show was hilarious, and he just seemed like a nice guy.</p>
<p>Too bad nice guys don&#8217;t win football games.</p>
<p>Good Luck Branch and thanks for the 4th round, New England.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://12thmanrising.com/2010/10/11/bye-bye-branch-hello-4th-round/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Deion Branch Trade Rumors</title>
		<link>http://12thmanrising.com/2010/10/07/deion-branch-trade-rumors/</link>
		<comments>http://12thmanrising.com/2010/10/07/deion-branch-trade-rumors/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 19:25:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Seahawks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deion Branch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New England Patriots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seattle Seahawks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wide receiver]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://12thmanrising.com/?p=3922</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you haven&#8217;t heard by now, there are several trade rumors involving the Seattle Seahawks and wide receiver Deion Branch. The rumors surfaced following speculation from the Boston Herald, and continue today &#8212; although recent reports suggest any trade talks are preliminary and nothing more. Ian Rapoport, a beat writer for the Boston Herald who [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you haven&#8217;t heard by now, there are several trade rumors involving the Seattle Seahawks and wide receiver Deion Branch.</p>
<p>The rumors surfaced following speculation from the Boston Herald, and continue today &#8212; although recent reports suggest any trade talks are preliminary and nothing more.</p>
<p>Ian Rapoport, a beat writer for the Boston Herald who covers the New England Patriots, fueled speculation earlier this morning via Twitter:</p>
<blockquote><p>Patriots always in discussions with teams. Considering they lost a WR, that&#8217;s a focus. 1 team on preliminary talks is Seahawks</p></blockquote>
<p> <a href="http://12thmanrising.com/2010/10/07/deion-branch-trade-rumors/#more-3922" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://12thmanrising.com/2010/10/07/deion-branch-trade-rumors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Marshawn Lynch &#8220;Couldn&#8217;t Stand&#8221; Pete Carroll</title>
		<link>http://12thmanrising.com/2010/10/07/marshawn-lynch-couldnt-stand-pete-carroll/</link>
		<comments>http://12thmanrising.com/2010/10/07/marshawn-lynch-couldnt-stand-pete-carroll/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 17:40:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Seahawks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[head coach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marshawn Lynch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pac-10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pete Carroll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Running Back]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seattle Seahawks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Southern California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://12thmanrising.com/?p=3919</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Before Pete Carroll joined the Seahawks, I couldn&#8217;t stand him. As a die-hard Husky fan and University of Washington alumnus, I cringed when Southern California&#8217;s former head coach came to town. Of course, some of it could have been obvious hatred towards the best; it is easy to hate the Yankees, Lakers, or other dynasties [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Before Pete Carroll joined the Seahawks, I couldn&#8217;t stand him. As a die-hard Husky fan and University of Washington alumnus, I cringed when Southern California&#8217;s former head coach came to town.</p>
<p>Of course, some of it could have been obvious hatred towards the best; it is easy to hate the Yankees, Lakers, or other dynasties because of their success.</p>
<p>Watching Pete Carroll parade up and down the field commending his players for big plays made against your favorite football team definitely added salt to the wound. I learned to hate Pete Carroll, and I&#8217;m sure several other Seahawks fans would agree with me.</p>
<p>Apparently, some professional players feel the same way.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.heraldnet.com/article/20101006/BLOG06/101009886/1018/SPORTS09">John Boyle of the Everett Herald</a> published a nice interview with running back Marshawn Lynch, who the Seahawks traded for last Tuesday. Lynch played football at the University of California, another Pac-10 school and Southern California rival.</p>
<p> <a href="http://12thmanrising.com/2010/10/07/marshawn-lynch-couldnt-stand-pete-carroll/#more-3919" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://12thmanrising.com/2010/10/07/marshawn-lynch-couldnt-stand-pete-carroll/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Seahawks Trade for Marshawn Lynch</title>
		<link>http://12thmanrising.com/2010/10/05/seahawks-trade-for-marshawn-lynch/</link>
		<comments>http://12thmanrising.com/2010/10/05/seahawks-trade-for-marshawn-lynch/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Oct 2010 19:05:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Popular]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Buffalo Bills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jay Glazer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Schneider]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Julius Jones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marshawn Lynch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Running Back]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seattle Seahawks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://12thmanrising.com/?p=3914</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to Jay Glazer via Twitter, the Seahawks have acquired running back Marshawn Lynch from the Buffalo Bills. Breaking news: I&#8217;m reporting seattle has traded for bills rb marshawn lynch for 4th in 2011 and cond pick 2012. Great move for &#8216;hawks Jason La Canfora, Adam Schefter, and several other media sources are reporting a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to <a href="http://twitter.com/Jay_Glazer/status/26479478211">Jay Glazer via Twitter</a>, the Seahawks have acquired running back Marshawn Lynch from the Buffalo Bills.</p>
<blockquote><p>Breaking news: I&#8217;m reporting seattle has traded for bills rb marshawn lynch for 4th in 2011 and cond pick 2012. Great move for &#8216;hawks</p></blockquote>
<p>Jason La Canfora, Adam Schefter, and several other media sources are reporting a similar deal. The Seattle Seahawks have not officially confirmed the trade.</p>
<p>According to other reports, <a href="http://twitter.com/ProFootballTalk/status/26480470029">Julius Jones will be released</a> to make room for Marshawn Lynch on the 53-man roster.</p>
<p><strong>UPDATE:</strong> According to Adam Schefter, Buffalo will receive a 2011 fourth-round pick and a 2012 conditional pick. The conditional pick is believed to be a sixth-round pick that could become a fifth-round pick based on Marshawn Lynch&#8217;s performance.</p>
<p><em>Shaun Dolence: </em><a href="mailto:dolencesm@gmail.com"><em><strong>dolencesm@gmail.com</strong></em></a><br />
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/12thmanrising"><em><strong>Follow 12th Man Rising</strong></em></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://12thmanrising.com/2010/10/05/seahawks-trade-for-marshawn-lynch/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Charlie Whitehurst, Heir Presumptive</title>
		<link>http://12thmanrising.com/2010/10/05/charlie-whitehurst-heir-apparent/</link>
		<comments>http://12thmanrising.com/2010/10/05/charlie-whitehurst-heir-apparent/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Oct 2010 17:50:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Seahawks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona Cardinals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charlie Whitehurst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Anderson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kurt Warner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matt Hasselbeck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matt Leinart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Football League]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quarterback]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seattle Seahawks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://12thmanrising.com/?p=3910</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After the disaster in St. Louis, a lot of fans would like to see Charlie Whitehurst on the field a lot more. Matt Hasselbeck, the current starting quarterback, has been mostly ineffective through the first quarter of the season. At 35 years old and with a contract that expires at the end of the season, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After the disaster in St. Louis, a lot of fans would like to see Charlie Whitehurst on the field a lot more.</p>
<p>Matt Hasselbeck, the current starting quarterback, has been mostly ineffective through the first quarter of the season. At 35 years old and with a contract that expires at the end of the season, critics will point out that Hasselbeck is obviously not a part of the team&#8217;s future. With Hasselbeck on the field, it could be argued the team&#8217;s long-term growth is inhibited.</p>
<p>Regardless of your opinion, Matt Hasselbeck is still the starting quarterback. But I&#8217;m still glad Charlie Whitehurst is a part of the football team.</p>
<p>No matter how good or bad Whitehurst may end up, it is hard to argue his potential. He possesses excellent size, mobility, and a strong arm. As a football prospect, his tangible assets are superb.</p>
<p>Whitehurst&#8217;s intangibles are difficult to assess, but I&#8217;m happy his potential is in Seattle.</p>
<p> <a href="http://12thmanrising.com/2010/10/05/charlie-whitehurst-heir-apparent/#more-3910" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://12thmanrising.com/2010/10/05/charlie-whitehurst-heir-apparent/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Seattle Seahawks Decide Not to Pursue Vincent Jackson</title>
		<link>http://12thmanrising.com/2010/09/24/seattle-seahawks-decide-not-to-pursue-vincent-jackson/</link>
		<comments>http://12thmanrising.com/2010/09/24/seattle-seahawks-decide-not-to-pursue-vincent-jackson/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2010 09:43:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Seahawks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brandon Marshall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Braylon Edwards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DUI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free agent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Clayton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Schneider]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFL Draft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Allen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pete Carroll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seattle Seahawks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim Ruskell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vincent Jackson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wide receiver]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://12thmanrising.com/?p=3847</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Through the offseason and into the regular season, Seattle&#8217;s new front office has been quite difficult to figure out, to say the least. When Tim Ruskell was in town, his moves were sometimes predictable. Predictable isn&#8217;t a great trait for a general manager, but Ruskell was egotistical and very disciplined in his philosophy on building [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Through the offseason and into the regular season, Seattle&#8217;s new front office has been quite difficult to figure out, to say the least.</p>
<p>When Tim Ruskell was in town, his moves were sometimes predictable. Predictable isn&#8217;t a great trait for a general manager, but Ruskell was egotistical and very disciplined in his philosophy on building a football team.</p>
<p>Ruskell wanted to obtain players who had won before. He wanted determined players with experience against the best competition, a team-first attitude, and a relentless work ethic. Most importantly, the player had to be of high character, a stand-up citizen, and well-behaved off the field.</p>
<p>Ruskell&#8217;s philosophy landed players like Deion Branch, Patrick Kerney, and Julius Jones. In the NFL Draft, Ruskell opted for experienced, &#8220;safe&#8221; picks like Kelly Jennings, Lawrence Jackson, and Aaron Curry.</p>
<p>We knew what to expect when Tim Ruskell was in charge. The new regime, however, is still somewhat mysterious.</p>
<p>We had no idea what to expect in last April&#8217;s draft. Some people thought John Schneider would submit to Pete Carroll and favor players from Southern California and the Pac-10 Conference. Others assumed the Seahawks would significantly reach for a quarterback like Jimmy Clausen or Tim Tebow.</p>
<p> <a href="http://12thmanrising.com/2010/09/24/seattle-seahawks-decide-not-to-pursue-vincent-jackson/#more-3847" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://12thmanrising.com/2010/09/24/seattle-seahawks-decide-not-to-pursue-vincent-jackson/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Additional Cuts Include Julius Jones, Jordan Babineaux</title>
		<link>http://12thmanrising.com/2010/09/06/additional-cuts-include-julius-jones-jordan-babineaux/</link>
		<comments>http://12thmanrising.com/2010/09/06/additional-cuts-include-julius-jones-jordan-babineaux/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 10:49:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[53-man roster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big Play Babs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Darrell Jackson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evan Dietrich-Smith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Schneider]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jordan Babineaux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Julius Jones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Junior Siavii]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Ellison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Vickerson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LenDale White]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mansfield Wrotto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Robinson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nate Ness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Football League]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFL Draft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Owen Schmitt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pete Carroll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Runaway Beer Truck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seattle Seahawks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Vallos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://12thmanrising.com/?p=3759</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Saturday, the Seahawks trimmed their roster down to 53 players. As it turns out, the initial cuts were only the beginning for John Schneider and the Seattle Seahawks. On Sunday, the Seahawks continued to churn and trim their roster, cutting several veterans and signing players released by other teams around the league. Here is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Saturday, the Seahawks trimmed their roster down to 53 players. As it turns out, the initial cuts were only the beginning for John Schneider and the Seattle Seahawks.</p>
<p>On Sunday, the Seahawks continued to <a href="http://www.seahawks.com/news/articles/article-1/Wrotto-Vallos-latest-cuts/15973447-f525-4732-937f-f21f91a9e443">churn and trim their roster</a>, cutting several veterans and signing players released by other teams around the league.</p>
<p>Here is a quick list of who the Seahawks released yesterday:</p>
<p><strong>Jordan Babineaux</strong> had been with the Seahawks since 2004 after signing with the team as an undrafted free agent. For most of his career, Babineaux excelled as the third cornerback in nickel packages; his ability to make timely plays earned him the nickname Big Play Babs. Last season, Babineaux started all 16 games for the Seahawks as a safety. He will be remembered most for the game-saving tackle made on Tony Romo following a fumbled snap in the 2007 NFL Playoffs.</p>
<p><strong>Kevin Ellison</strong>, who played for Pete Carroll at the University of Southern California, was acquired by the Seahawks after being released by the San Diego Chargers following an off-field indiscretion. As a rookie in 2009, Ellison started 9 games at safety for the Chargers. Ellison is a former sixth-round pick who most expected to be cut the day before.</p>
<p><strong>Julius Jones</strong> is definitely not a fan favorite, but he has lasted several years in Seattle despite regime turnover and fan criticism. Jones started 24 games for the Seahawks in two seasons after leaving Dallas as a free agent in 2007. In Seattle, Jones rushed for 1,361 yards and averaged just over 4.0 yards per carry. Nothing is confirmed yet, but several reports say <a href="http://twitter.com/Adam_Schefter/status/23085110678">Jones will be released</a>. If he is on the roster after Monday, his base salary of $2.45 million in 2010 becomes guaranteed.</p>
<p> <a href="http://12thmanrising.com/2010/09/06/additional-cuts-include-julius-jones-jordan-babineaux/#more-3759" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://12thmanrising.com/2010/09/06/additional-cuts-include-julius-jones-jordan-babineaux/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Report: Teams Have Made Offers for Houshmandzadeh</title>
		<link>http://12thmanrising.com/2010/09/04/report-teams-have-made-offers-for-houshmandzadeh/</link>
		<comments>http://12thmanrising.com/2010/09/04/report-teams-have-made-offers-for-houshmandzadeh/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 17:13:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Seahawks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona Cardinals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota Vikings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Jets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Diego Chargers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seattle Seahawks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[T.J. Houshmandzadeh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wide receiver]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://12thmanrising.com/?p=3747</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A trade still seems unlikely, but Joe Reedy of  the Cincinnati Enquirer reports that the Minnesota Vikings, New York Jets, San Diego Chargers, and Arizona Cardinals have all made offers to acquire T.J. Houshmandzadeh from Seattle. Regardless of the report, most analysts are still reporting a trade won&#8217;t happen; it will be too difficult to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A trade still seems unlikely, but <a href="http://twitter.com/joereedy/status/22947652861">Joe Reedy of  the Cincinnati Enquirer</a> reports that the Minnesota Vikings, New York Jets, San Diego Chargers, and Arizona Cardinals have all made offers to acquire T.J. Houshmandzadeh from Seattle.</p>
<p>Regardless of the report, most analysts are still reporting a trade won&#8217;t happen; it will be too difficult to move Houshmandzadeh&#8217;s $7 million guaranteed salary.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re optimistic, however, it is a good sign that teams have made offers (if the report is accurate). If the Seahawks are truly committed to dumping Housh, trading him would be the best route. By releasing him, the Seahawks are on the hook for millions of dollars and lose their leading receiver from 2009 without compensation.</p>
<p><em>Shaun Dolence: <a href="mailto:dolencesm@gmail.com">dolencesm@gmail.com</a></em><br />
<em><a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/12thmanrising">Follow 12th Man Rising</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://12thmanrising.com/2010/09/04/report-teams-have-made-offers-for-houshmandzadeh/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vincent Jackson to Seattle Still Possible?</title>
		<link>http://12thmanrising.com/2010/09/03/vincent-jackson-to-seattle-still-possible/</link>
		<comments>http://12thmanrising.com/2010/09/03/vincent-jackson-to-seattle-still-possible/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 00:01:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Seahawks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[A.J. Smith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contract]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deon Butler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Manager]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Golden Tate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Schneider]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Williams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patrick Crayton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[release]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roster Exempt List]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Diego Chargers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seattle Seahawks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[suspension]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[T.J. Houshmandzadeh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vincent Jackson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wide receiver]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://12thmanrising.com/?p=3744</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Seahawks are moving on without T.J. Houshmandzadeh, and younger receivers on Seattle&#8217;s roster should benefit from his departure. Mike Williams, who many considered wasted talent prior to last month, will have an opportunity to start at wide receiver. Golden Tate, Deon Butler, and other younger receivers will have a lot of balls thrown their [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Seahawks are moving on without T.J. Houshmandzadeh, and younger receivers on Seattle&#8217;s roster should benefit from his departure. Mike Williams, who many considered wasted talent prior to last month, will have an opportunity to start at wide receiver. Golden Tate, Deon Butler, and other younger receivers will have a lot of balls thrown their way with T.J. out of the picture.</p>
<p>For now, the Seattle Seahawks are supposedly committed to the young players on their roster. But with Houshmandzadeh presumably leaving town, there are widespread rumors the Seahawks will seek another younger, more capable replacement.</p>
<p>The Seahawks have obviously been interested in acquiring Vincent Jackson from San Diego for some time. According to rumors, Houshmandzadeh&#8217;s release could be a step towards a possible trade that would bring Jackson to Seattle.</p>
<p>Seattle was given permission last month to speak with Jackson&#8217;s representatives – to discuss contract details, presumably – but nothing materialized in terms of a trade. The Seahawks reportedly balked at Jackson&#8217;s request for a five-year, $50 million contract.</p>
<p> <a href="http://12thmanrising.com/2010/09/03/vincent-jackson-to-seattle-still-possible/#more-3744" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://12thmanrising.com/2010/09/03/vincent-jackson-to-seattle-still-possible/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Seahawks Prepared to Cut Ties with T.J. Houshmandzadeh</title>
		<link>http://12thmanrising.com/2010/09/03/seahawks-prepared-to-cut-ties-with-t-j-houshmandzadeh/</link>
		<comments>http://12thmanrising.com/2010/09/03/seahawks-prepared-to-cut-ties-with-t-j-houshmandzadeh/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 23:16:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Seahawks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adam Schefter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contract]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Schneider]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Williams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Football League]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Allen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pete Carroll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rumor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seattle Seahawks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[T.J. Houshmandzadeh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim Ruskell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wide receiver]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://12thmanrising.com/?p=3741</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Whether he is traded or released, T.J. Houshmandzadeh will no longer be a wide receiver for the Seattle Seahawks. According to ESPN&#8217;s Adam Schefter, the Seahawks are prepared to move forward without Housh: The Seattle Seahawks will cut ties with T.J. Houshmandzadeh by trading or releasing him, according to two league sources, and it will [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whether he is traded or released, T.J. Houshmandzadeh will no longer be a wide receiver for the Seattle Seahawks.</p>
<p>According to <a href="http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=5529209">ESPN&#8217;s Adam Schefter</a>, the Seahawks are prepared to move forward without Housh:</p>
<blockquote><p>The Seattle Seahawks will cut ties with T.J. Houshmandzadeh by trading or releasing him, according to two league sources, and it will promote former Detroit first-round draft pick Mike Williams into its starting lineup for a Sept. 12 game against San Francisco.</p></blockquote>
<p>A trade would obviously be the most preferable option for the Seahawks. By trading Houshmandzadeh, the Seahawks would not only receive compensation – albeit minimal – they would also be able to dump his large contract on another franchise.</p>
<p>But Houshmandzadeh&#8217;s contract, signed last year while Tim Ruskell was making decisions, makes a trade unlikely.  Houshmandzadeh is guaranteed over $7 million in 2010 and has four years remaining on his original five-year deal.</p>
<p>By releasing Housh, the Seahawks would be on the hook for his guaranteed 2010 salary. Even though Paul Allen&#8217;s pockets seem bottomless, $7+ million is a lot to pay a player who isn&#8217;t on the team.</p>
<p> <a href="http://12thmanrising.com/2010/09/03/seahawks-prepared-to-cut-ties-with-t-j-houshmandzadeh/#more-3741" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://12thmanrising.com/2010/09/03/seahawks-prepared-to-cut-ties-with-t-j-houshmandzadeh/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>T.J. Houshmandzadeh Out, Vincent Jackson In?</title>
		<link>http://12thmanrising.com/2010/09/02/t-j-houshmandzadeh-out-vincent-jackson-in/</link>
		<comments>http://12thmanrising.com/2010/09/02/t-j-houshmandzadeh-out-vincent-jackson-in/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 00:25:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Seahawks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Schneider]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota Vikings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pete Carroll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Diego Chargers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seattle Seahawks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[T.J. Houshmandzadeh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vincent Jackson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wide receiver]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://12thmanrising.com/?p=3736</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Minneapolis Star-Tribune has an interesting report regard the T.J. Houshmandzadeh trade rumors. Of course, the Minnesota Vikings were the losers – or winners, I suppose – of the Houshmandzadeh sweepstakes last year but could have a shot at landing him if he becomes available. Besides considering a &#8220;second shot&#8221; at acquiring Houshmandzadeh, Judd Zulgad, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://www.startribune.com/sports/vikings/blogs/102100118.html?elr=KArksUUUoDEy3LGDiO7aiU">Minneapolis Star-Tribune</a> has an interesting report regard the T.J. Houshmandzadeh trade rumors. Of course, the Minnesota Vikings were the losers – or winners, I suppose – of the Houshmandzadeh sweepstakes last year but could have a shot at landing him if he becomes available.</p>
<p>Besides considering a &#8220;second shot&#8221; at acquiring Houshmandzadeh, Judd Zulgad, who wrote the article, mentions that the Seahawks could be looking to create room for another big-contract player: Vincent Jackson.</p>
<p>The Seahawks have been rumored to have serious interest in acquiring Jackson from the San Diego Chargers, but the price of compensating San Diego and a new contract may be too high.</p>
<p>From <a href="http://www.startribune.com/sports/vikings/blogs/102100118.html?elr=KArksUUUoDEy3LGDiO7aiU">Zulgad&#8217;s article</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Now it appears the Vikings could have another shot at Houshmandzadeh – if they are interested. The Seahawks are actively shopping Houshmandzadeh, according to NFL sources. The story was first reported this afternoon by Jason La Canfora of the NFL Network.</p>
<p>Seattle is believed to be trying to unload Houshmandzadeh because it would like an opportunity to clear salary cap space to potentially add disgruntled San Diego wide receiver Vincent Jackson in a trade. Houshmandzadeh is due to make $7 million plus guaranteed this coming season.</p></blockquote>
<p><em>Shaun Dolence: <a href="mailto:dolencesm@gmail.com">dolencesm@gmail.com</a></em><br />
<em><a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/12thmanrising">Follow 12th Man Rising</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://12thmanrising.com/2010/09/02/t-j-houshmandzadeh-out-vincent-jackson-in/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Seattle Seahawks Trying to Move T.J. Houshmandzadeh</title>
		<link>http://12thmanrising.com/2010/09/02/seattle-seahawks-trying-to-move-t-j-houshmandzadeh/</link>
		<comments>http://12thmanrising.com/2010/09/02/seattle-seahawks-trying-to-move-t-j-houshmandzadeh/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 00:11:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Seahawks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brock Huard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contract]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jason La Canfora]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Schneider]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Football League]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pete Carroll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seattle Seahawks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[T.J. Houshmandzadeh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wide receiver]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://12thmanrising.com/?p=3733</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Earlier this week, Brock Huard of 710 ESPN in Seattle discussed T.J. Houshmandzadeh&#8217;s future in Seattle. Huard pointed out that Houshmandzadeh may not fit in Seattle&#8217;s plans and could possibly be cut when the team trims down to 53 players this weekend. According to Huard, Houshmandzadeh is a better fit as a slot receiver. Houshmandzadeh, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Earlier this week, <a href="http://mynorthwest.com/?nid=577&amp;a=20273&amp;p=3&amp;n=Brock%20and%20Salk">Brock Huard of 710 ESPN</a> in Seattle discussed T.J. Houshmandzadeh&#8217;s future in Seattle. Huard pointed out that Houshmandzadeh may not fit in Seattle&#8217;s plans and could possibly be cut when the team trims down to 53 players this weekend.</p>
<p>According to Huard, Houshmandzadeh is a better fit as a slot receiver. Houshmandzadeh, however, may not be willing to accept a lesser role with the Seahawks. If his attitude becomes problematic and he doesn&#8217;t fit into future plans, the Seahawks might actually benefit from cutting him.</p>
<p>Last year, Houshmandzadeh signed a five-year deal, $40 million contract with the Seahawks. It wasn&#8217;t John Schneider&#8217;s deal, but the team still has a lot invested in Houshmandzadeh. Cutting him seems pointless, especially considering he is guaranteed more than $7 million in 2010.</p>
<p>Houshmandzadeh may be a  better fit in the slot, but he was still Seattle&#8217;s most productive receiver in 2009. Though his statistics weren&#8217;t Pro Bowl worthy, Housh did catch 79 passes for 911 yards.</p>
<p>If the Seahawks cut Houshmandzadeh, they would be on the hook for a ton of money and lose their most productive receiver from the previous season. Planning for the future is okay, but dumping Houshmandzadeh without compensation seems foolish.</p>
<p>Today, several sources have reported the Seahawks are actively shopping Houshmandzadeh. They&#8217;re only rumors now, but a trade makes sense for Seattle if they&#8217;re looking to move forward without T.J.</p>
<p> <a href="http://12thmanrising.com/2010/09/02/seattle-seahawks-trying-to-move-t-j-houshmandzadeh/#more-3733" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://12thmanrising.com/2010/09/02/seattle-seahawks-trying-to-move-t-j-houshmandzadeh/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Database Caching 24/50 queries in 0.126 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 1728/2006 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via cdn.fansided.com

 Served from: 12thmanrising.com @ 2013-05-21 13:44:22 by W3 Total Cache -->