Draft Fallout

by Seahawks

Whether you’re a fan of what the Seahawks accomplished during the draft or not, you have to applaud the fact that the team made a commitment to improve the offensive line. Management has decided upon a direction the team will go in. Now, it’s up to them to ensure that the team does not waver from that commitment and continue to make roster changes that support this new direction. If they do, then the team must start Charlie Whitehurst at quarterback and allow Matt Hasselbeck to sign elsewhere. Re-signing Hasselbeck would undermine what the team is trying to accomplish in the long term.

At this time, the intentions of the team are to start John Moffitt at right guard and James Carpenter at right tackle. To do anything else after using their top two draft choices on these players is foolish. By starting these rookies next to each other from Day 1, the Seahawks have to know the risk they are taking. Moffitt and Carpenter are not going to step in and dominate. They are going to make mistakes and take their lumps while the offensive line as a whole learns to become a unit. The objective is to show significant progress by the end of the season so that the offensive line isn’t a big concern next offseason.

Matt Hasselbeck’s age, injury susceptibility and declining performance no longer make him a good fit with Seattle. I admire Hasselbeck. He has been a great representative of the franchise, a solid player for several seasons, and is a lock for the Seahawks’ Ring of Honor. There is a high likelihood no one else will ever wear number 8 for the Seahawks. He still has gas left in the tank, as he showed during the playoff win against the New Orleans Saints last season. It was the greatest game he ever played and it would be fitting if that were his final game as a Seahawk at Qwest Field.

However, Hasselbeck did not have a good season last year if you look at it in its entirety. He had some fine games, but he also had several brutal ones. Injuries may have played a part, but some of the decisions Hasselbeck made last season were atrocious; ones I wouldn’t expect from a rookie. The team is building for the future, and Hasselbeck is the present.

The main reason Hasselbeck no longer fits with the Seahawks is because he has developed “happy feet”. The offensive line last season was not as bad as it was portrayed. The run blocking was atrocious, perhaps the worst I’ve ever seen from a professional football team. However, the pass protection wasn’t that bad. It wasn’t great, but it was a marked improvement over the previous two seasons. Hasselbeck had a tendency to rush throws and break from his progressions because of perceived pressure that wasn’t always there.

That situation is not going to improve this season. The offensive line will likely take one step back so it can take four steps forward in 2012. With an extremely young, inexperienced line featuring two rookies on the right side, Hasselbeck’s confidence in the pocket is not going to improve. The Seahawks’ quarterback next season is going to have to make some plays with his legs, and Hasselbeck shouldn’t be put in that position. Almost all of Hasselbeck’s injuries the last few years have come while he was running the ball.

Charlie Whitehurst, however, can make plays with his legs, as he showed in last year’s regular season finale against the Rams. I don’t believe the Seahawks would have won that game with Hasselbeck under center because he wouldn’t have been able to avoid the Rams’ pass rush. Whitehurst made several key plays by running the ball when protection broke down. He is going to have to do that a LOT this upcoming season.

If Hasselbeck does not return, and I don’t think it would be in the team’s best interest long-term for him to do so, one of the things to watch will be who makes the line calls. Hasselbeck had been making them for the last few years, which is one reason why the team did so poorly when he was out. Whitehurst isn’t experienced enough to make those calls, which will leave it up to Max Unger, who isn’t very experienced himself. It’s just another part of the growing pains the offensive line will endure this season.

If the Seahawks were to re-sign Hasselbeck, they’d be selling themselves out and taking a gigantic step backwards in their efforts to rebuild the franchise. Management made a commitment during the draft, and the worst thing they could do is make moves that undermine that effort. Every move the team makes from here on out must reinforce that commitment.

This team is going to take some lumps this season, but by staying the course they’ve set, hopefully the team will rebound quickly. People have been telling me to have faith in the front office. They need to have faith in themselves.

Tags: , ,

Comments
Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest

I think any sentence that says Hasselbeck is a better QB than Whitehurst should be prefaced with "if healthy". If Matt is re-signed by the team with a one- or two-year tender, there's still a good chance we'll see Whitehurst, because of Hasselbeck's recent history of chronic injury. And I am really not sure how or why anyone is sold on Kolb. What is the empirical basis? He spent most of last season watching from the sideline.

"Re-signing Hasselbeck would undermine what the team is trying to accomplish"

I disagree. The only thing preventing them from signing him is price. If Hasselbeck demands $16M, that's too much and will cost them in terms of salary cap that could be spent elsewhere. Hasselbeck is a better QB than Whitehurst, who's a backup at best who can't even slide. Analysts are already saying that if they are starting Whitehust, they will be drafting high enough next year to draft Andrew Luck.

"To do anything else after using their top two draft choices on these players is foolish"

Carpenter and Moffitt will be penciled in as starters but they have to earn staying there. The should not be handed anything over other players if they are out-performed or out-hustled.

"The offensive line last season was not as bad as it was portrayed"

Yes, it really was that bad and then some. Statistically, analytically, man for man, in every way the offensive line was horrible last season except for Okung, when he wasn't hurt. Starters from last year won't even make the team this year. Spencer and Locklear aren't even going to be asked back to compete for backup spots.

The line will be much better this year, even with two rookies and Unger coming off injury. It will be better because it will give Lynch room to run and it will be better because it will have no problem with short yardage situations. The passing game will work better because the running game will make it work better.

Joseph-

after reading your article I must say I disagree with your whole pointwhat they did in the draft was based on what they saw as the best players available FOR THEM. They drafted them based on where they knew for sure they could get them. Just because the "experts" on tv don't agree with the picks, doesn't mean anything. The Seahawks do their own evaluations and have their own scouts who know what THE SEAHAWKS are looking for. They do more research than just reading nfl.com and recieving daily emails from bleacher report. To suggest that Carrol has to be blindly stubborn is just not correct. I say he should trade Charlie Whitehust for a 7th round pick in the 2014 draft if that's what he feels is best for the team, not just say "well I recruited him so I must start him or else I messed up" NO! Mistakes and misreads happen, you can't just start a guy cause you drafted him or paid a bunch for him. If they don't feel that Moffit is the guy to start at gaurd next year than he shouldn't be the guy to start. Carroll will do what he and the FO think is best for the team and won't care what anyone has to say, just like he didn't care what any of the "experts" had to say when they drafted Carpenter in the first round, and that's the attitude you must have to run a football team

If they don't intend to start Moffitt right away, then that is a HORRIBLE pick. When you pick in the first three rounds, you should be getting players that you feel are capable of starting. With all the problems the offensive line has had the last few years and with all of the turnover that's expected, Moffitt MUST start. If he doesn't, then that is a major mistake by management.

Joseph and Phillip:
What you are not understanding is the fact that Kolb is ready to start NOW. He has put in his time behind a veteran qb and The Eagles had every intention on having him as the starter last year. I think he has the tools and is ready to go, and I would be much happier with him leading the team than us taking a mid 1st round gamble qb who probably won't be ready to play right away. I would be plenty happy giving up next year's first for the guy and even more. I also like REALLY like Orton, and Palmer is a possibility. If they are ready to hand Clipboard Jesus the keys than that's fine but I don't think that they are. I have trust in those guys to make the best decision based on what they see out of Whitehurst and in what they can get a qb for in a trade. I don't think drafing a qb next year is an option, if they wanted to go that route, than this was the year

Jrock, I wouldn't trade for Kolb for a couple of reasons. First, it's entirely possible that the Seahawks could have a top five selection in next year's draft, a draft that could feature two fantastic QB prospects at the top in Luck and Barkley, who are far better than anyone in this year's draft. That's too high a price to risk paying. Second, demand for Kolb seems to be very high. It might take MORE than just a first rounder to get him, perhaps a first and a third rounder, or even more. Again, too high a price, even if the Seahawks had mid-round selections.

Im all for keeping Matt if nothing else is out there. But if we get stuck after the offseason w/ Out a QB and our option is a Kevin Kolb trade then Im 100% against it if it cost us our 1st rounder. The Hawks are going to be taking some lumps again. That 1st rounder will be a top 15 and with Luck, Barkley and Landry in the draft in 2012 their is no way I trade that pick. We need all the draft ammo we can get, hopefully some one will slip to us but if not we need trade bait and not having a 1st rounder is bad business. Let Clip Board Jesus take some snaps and hold those picks.

Phillip, I couldn't agree more. People forget that if the draft order this year was based on record, the Seahawks would have drafted 15th. With a tougher schedule (especially on the road) and an inexperienced offensive line, the Seahawks could realistically end up with a top five pick. I also believe keeping our 2012 first round pick should be a priority.

I think the Seahawks are going to trade our #1 pick next year for QB Kevin Kolb. He is better than any quarterback drafted this year, he is fairly young (26) and Pete Carroll wants to win now!