Admitting That I Was Wrong

by Recaps

A little over a month ago, with the Seahawks stumbling as a team and looking like one that would be in the Andrew Luck sweepstakes than anything else. The defense had played well, but the offense had been really bad, especially QB Tarvaris Jackson.

It was at that time that I called for a QB change. It was time to try and see if Charlie Whitehurst could provide a spark. Jackson was hurting the team. He was holding on to the ball too long and taking needless sacks. He was refusing to throw the ball more than 3 yards down field, even on 3rd and 8. It wasn’t working.

At least I was smart enough realize that Whitehurst wasn’t going to be much better

This is probably long overdue, but It’s time to admit that I was wrong about Jackson. Don’t get me wrong, he had ben genuinely awful. My mistake was that I didn’t see how he could improve. He’d been bad in Minnesota, bad all preseason, and bad in all the games up to that point. There was no reason to believe he could suddenly flip the switch and play well enough to win games.

Any yet he did flip that switch. Since halftime of week 4, Jackson has been one of the better QB’s in the NFL. His completion percentage is up. His yards per pass is way up. It’s been like he’s a whole different QB. It’s been as amazing as it was unexpected.

Whitehurst meanwhile has been a huge disappointment. After playing well at the end of the Giants game to preserve the win, he’s regressed back to being completely inept. For 5 quarters the offense looked as bad as it did back in the beginning of the season. Whitehurst’s allure was that he was unknown. We didn’t know what he was. Now we do, and its not something that we want to see on the field ever again for the Seahawks.

Clearly there can be no doubting who should be playing QB, especially after last week. Whitehurst played the first quarter and could do nothing. Jackson comes in a light’s up the same defense for over 300 yards in just 3 quarters. The offense is simply so much better with Jackson in there under center.

So there you have it. I was wrong. I admit it. Feel free to make fun of me for it for a while. It’s all good.

Comments
Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
DarinPike 5 pts

But some of us did see what Jackson was offering. Some of us saw that it wasn't a lack of ability holding Jackson back, and recognized that a QB isn't holding the ball too long when he gets sacked by a DL that basically came in un-touched. Some of us also recognized that Jackson was being held back and not being released to press the ball down the field. Oh...and Jackson wasn't terrible during the first two weeks of the season. He had a good 2nd half in SF, and the issues in Pittsburgh weren't on T Jack.

Keith_12thMR 36 pts

DarinPike

I get what you’re saying to a point. For 8 of the 14 sacks that took place in weeks 1-3, Jackson had time to throw the ball. That doesn’t mean anyone was open on all those plays, but he had plenty of time and could have thrown the ball away. That’s more than half, so claiming that it was all on the O-line isn’t fair. Yes, that’s still way too many times that the Line failed at their jobs, but that doesn’t exonerate Jackson.

I’ve also read in places that Jackson was being allowed to throw the ball down field as you’ve suggested. Certainly it seemed that way, but no one, not Jackson, or Carroll or anyone has said that was the case. I think it’s more likely that the coaches emphasized ball security and Jackson took it too far.

I understand that this issue was polarizing, so lets not over or under state any of the problems. Jackson definitely wasnt THE problem in week 1-3. But that doesn’t mean he wasn’t a problem either. There’s plenty of blame to go around, and rightfully so. I happen to be of the opinion that Jackson’s recent very good play doesn’t shield him from taking his portion of the blame for early in the season.

DarinPike 5 pts

Keith_12thMR Those points are all fair. There have been a lot of issues with the offense. Not having an offseason really hurt the unit.I did an article before the Falcon game and commented on my take that Pete needed to stop holding the offense back and "unleash" T Jack. I got ripped by a few fans about that, stating there was no potency to be found. Pete did say after that game that he did open the offense up a lot in the second half and let T Jack air out the ball a lot more than he had. I believe it was on the Pete Carroll Show...